"Can we have all the photos?" A response template

This email arrives on a Tuesday and it makes everyone tense, mostly because it reads like a challenge when it is usually a worry. Almost nobody asking for all the photos wants a folder of 3,000 files. They want to know they did not miss something. Here is how to find out which it is, and what to write back.

This is a count question, not a format question

Two very different requests get written with almost the same words. One is about format: give me the original camera files, the untouched versions, the ones straight off the card. The other is about quantity: I know you took more pictures than this, where are the rest of them. They need different answers and mixing them up is what turns a two line reply into a three week negotiation.

This article is about the second one. If your client specifically wants the original camera files, that is a different conversation with a different script, and it is in what to say when a client asks for the RAW files. If what is really being requested is a folder of unfinished images, the boundaries for that are in should you deliver unedited photos.

Here is the useful reframe. When somebody asks for all the photos, they are usually saying one of two things: I do not want to have missed a moment that mattered to me, or I expected more than what I see. Both are reassurance problems wearing the costume of a policy demand. You do not need to send every shutter press to solve either one, and if you answer the policy instead of the worry you will win the argument and lose the review.

Work out what is actually wrong before you reply

Resist writing the long answer immediately. Four things produce this email and only one of them is solved by a policy explanation. Spend five minutes finding out which you have.

If the message is vague, one narrow question does more than any explanation: Is there a particular person, moment or part of the day you were hoping to see more of? That turns an abstract demand into information. It also signals that you are taking the feeling seriously rather than reaching for a clause. Do not open with burst rates and file formats. They may just be looking for a picture of a grandparent.

One caveat worth saying out loud. If the delivered count really is well under what you promised, or a scheduled part of the day genuinely is not there, investigate before you defend anything. A good policy is not a shield for a coverage mistake, and clients can tell the difference instantly.

The reply, in two lengths

Once you know the gallery is complete, the reply has four jobs in a fixed order: acknowledge the ask, define what the gallery is, explain why the extra frames are not in it, and invite a specific request. Short is better. A long defense reads like you are trying to win.

Two edits before you use either. Swap final edited images for whatever noun your contract uses, and never write every image if your package caps the count. Do not promise to search forever if your archive window closes at 90 days. Accuracy is what makes a template reusable instead of a trap. For shorter versions of the neighboring conversations, the scripts in our guide to client assisted culling cover the ones that come up at the same time.

The numbers that make the answer obvious

Sometimes the fastest way to end the worry is to show the shape of the day. Typical ranges are worth knowing well enough to quote from memory. An eight to ten hour wedding produces somewhere around 2,000 to 4,000 frames on the cards. A typical delivered gallery runs 400 to 800 finished images, which works out to roughly 40 to 60 delivered photos per hour of coverage.

That gap is not waste. It is how the good frames get made. You shoot the ring exchange as a burst because you get one attempt at it. You take the family group four times because somebody blinks in three of them. You fire a test frame when the light changes at the reception. Every one of those extra files exists so that the one in the gallery is right, and none of them is a photograph anyone would want to receive.

Do not lead with this. Arithmetic answers the wrong question if the client is worried about their father in law. But when the message really is I know there were more, a single line does a lot of work: There were about 3,000 frames on the cards. Around 700 of them are photographs. The rest are the same moments, taken more than once. We looked at that ratio in more detail in the wedding shot to delivered ratio, and if you suspect your own galleries have drifted large, stop over delivering photos is the companion piece.

Offer something bounded, and decide it in advance

Often you go and look, and you find usable frames you did not pick. Decide now what you do in that situation, because deciding it while writing an emotional email produces policies you cannot repeat.

• A small courtesy addition. Reasonable when there is a genuine oversight, like a guest who barely appears. Keep it to a handful, and say plainly that it is a one time addition.
• A proofing gallery of the alternates. Web size, labeled, with an expiry date, and a stated per image price for finishing any of them.
• An additional edit bundle. They choose, you finish, it is priced like the work it is.
• A future session. A client who wants more portraits is often better served by an anniversary shoot than by every micro variation from one afternoon.

Always name the next step and the date. I found 14 usable portrait alternates. I can put them up as proofs by Thursday, and finished edits from that set are priced per image. That sentence closes the loop, which is what the client wanted from the beginning.

What not to do is send an unfinished folder to make the conversation stop. It moves the sorting job onto the client, it puts your technical misses into their experience of your work, and it quietly changes the product for every client who hears about it afterward.

When the same question comes back a second time

Occasionally the template does not settle it. Reply once more, calmly, with the relevant language from the agreement and the concrete options available: check a named moment, or purchase additional finished edits. Then stop offering new arrangements. Repeated renegotiation by email does not make anyone feel more secure, and each new concession invites the next question.

An archive window is what turns a finished job into a finished job. Pick a period you can actually honor, 90 days or six months or a year, say it in the contract, and repeat it in the delivery email. After it passes you have a plain and defensible reason not to reopen a completed wedding, and before it passes you have a generous window in which you will genuinely go and look. Both halves matter. The window is not a way of saying no faster, it is a promise with an end date.

Tone does most of the work here. These conversations are very rarely hostile. Somebody is anxious, or a friend told them to ask. Answer warmly, give the reason once, offer the option, and move on. Defensiveness turns a fair question into a dispute.

Stop the question before it is asked

The clients who ask this are usually the ones who never saw a full gallery before they booked. Show one during the inquiry, not a highlight reel of twelve. When somebody has scrolled a real delivery and seen the density and the pacing, the idea that a 3,000 file card becomes a 3,000 image gallery does not form in the first place.

Then say it twice more. In the contract, describe the deliverable as final edited images with an estimated range where you can commit to one, and avoid the phrase all photos unless you define it. Our guide to how many wedding photos to deliver covers picking a number you can hit in a bad year as well as a good one. In the delivery email, one line does it: Your gallery is curated from the full day of coverage. If there is a moment you were hoping to see and cannot find, email me within [window] and I will check.

Not legal advice. Contract wording is general guidance here, written by a photographer rather than a lawyer, and the rules around deliverables and image usage vary by country and by state. Have someone qualified where you work review the wording you actually send.

It also helps to have explained the selection itself at some point before delivery, in your guide or a pre wedding email, which is what explaining the cull to clients is for. A client who already knows why 3,000 becomes 700 does not experience the gallery as incomplete.

Where Kepla fits, honestly

The reason this question is stressful is rarely the policy. It is the private worry that you cannot fully answer it, because nobody remembers frame 2,140 of a wedding they shot in June. Confidence in the reply comes from having genuinely seen the whole shoot.

That is what Kepla is for. It checks every frame against clear criteria, sharp focus, open eyes, expression, near identical frames, and hands you a shortlist. From a 2,000 photo wedding that is roughly 800 picks, in minutes rather than an evening. You still make the calls, but you make them having looked at everything rather than having survived it.

Said plainly: the picking app for iPhone, iPad and Mac is still being built. And Kepla never deletes, moves or renames a file. It marks which photos it picked, every original stays where it is, and anything it set aside is one tap away. That is exactly the state you want to be in when an email arrives asking about a moment from four months ago.

FAQ